In this section:
The
A functional entity only includes a Resource-Priority header field in a request or response forwarded to another entity within the trusted domain. If a request or response is forwarded to an entity outside the trusted domain, the functional entity removes the Resource-Priority header field from the forwarded request or response. If a request or response is received from an untrusted entity containing the Resource-Priority header field, the functional entity removes the Resource-Priority header field before forwarding the request or response within the trust domain.
In some deployments, the request for prioritization of a transaction/dialog is marked with the Resource-Priority header field by the UE. For other deployments, the request is identified as a priority request and marked for priority (via a Resource-Priority header field) by a functional entity (e.g., P-CSCF) within the network.
The characteristics of any priority scheme is defined by the namespace used. The namespace determines how priority is applied to the SIP signaling, to the bearer carrying the SIP signaling, and to the bearers carrying any media. Different priority levels exist within each namespace. Priority levels in one namespace have no relationship to the priority levels in any other namespace, i.e. priority level "1" in namespace "A" may have an entirely different level and characteristic of priority treatment to an identically labelled priority level "1" in namespace "B".
A network can support multiple namespaces. It is up to the network operator (potentially based on regulatory or contractual obligations) to define the relationship between the priority mechanisms for each namespace, as well as the call priority levels.
RPH received in a SIP request is used for rating priority to the request. The RPH received contains r-values, which is a combination of namespace and r-priority and defines the priority associated with the request.
When a message is classified as emergency, SBC adds a Resource-Priority header field towards the IMS core network where the core network uses the Resource-Priority header field to control the priority of emergency messages.
The
This does not require any profile matching logic for mid dialog requests. Also, CAC limitations are NOT applicable to these requests.
The
The Namespace and R-priority should match with the RPH profile attached to the ingress trunk group.
Based on the provisioned value of emergency oversubscription factor, priority is given to emergency SUBSCRIBE message in terms of:
Based on the provisioned value of emergency oversubscription factor, priority is given to non-INVITE OOD messages in terms of otherReqRateMax.
This applies to SUBSCRIBE, MESSAGE, OPTIONS, PUBLISH, REFER, and NOTIFY non-INVITE OOD messages.
.
When the resource-priority option-tag transparency flag is enabled, the resource-priority option-tag is transparently passed, when:
The resource-priority values are configured in emergency profile - RPH profile, and consist of the following two values:
When an LSWU is performed to a release which does not offer SIP RPH support for non-INVITE OOD messages, the value of provisioning fields related to this functionality must be set to default.